It’s been a decade since the attacks of Sept. 11th, and I’m still furious.
Furious that a day where we should honor the fallen has turned into some kind of self-important feelings day; furious that it pretty much took us a decade to hunt down Osama Bin Laden and finally kill him; furious that we’re still embroiled in two conflicts that were a direct result of the attacks.
But I’m especially furious about what’s happening at Ground Zero.
What’s happening in lower Manhattan is one of the worst mockeries in our nation’s history, perpetrated by the authorities who promised us the legacy of the Twin Towers would live on: the construction of the new WTC site.
The Lower Manhattan Development Corporation (the LMDC) spearheaded the initiative for the rebuilding of the site, working with the Port Authority and Silverstein Properties.
Drawing public ire by dragging their feet for the better part of a decade, they subjected New Yorkers to the grisly reminder of what was once there by leaving two gaping holes in the ground while in-fighting occurred amongst the organizations.
Then in 2004 came the punch line in this ongoing joke told by a bourgeois confederacy of real estate developer dunces: the LMDC would hold a contest on who could come up with the “best” design for the new WTC site. The sticker in this situation? The LMDC had no authority to hold the competition in the first place and had no power to implement the winning design.
What makes this joke even better is that you’re paying for it. For a site that is still technically on public land but being fought over by privatized interests, the American people get to sit back and open their wallets a little bit wider so the LMDC can continue the rampant fleecing.
In an Aug. 4th, 2006 article in the Downtown Express, it was reported that $45 million “has been shifted away from its promised uses” and still remains unaccounted for, while up to $15 million “was shifted to other places.”
As of Aug. 12 of this year, The New York Post has reported that over $2 billion in additional funding is needed to finish construction on the new WTC site and a project that was supposed to be completed sometime in between 2013 and 2016 is now pushed back yet again with no tentative date for said completion.
Some progress is being made at the site, however, but in one of the worst ways with the construction of “the Freedom Tower,” or 1 WTC.
This building, which has become the hopes and dreams of Ground Zero developers, is one of the biggest eyesores that 21st Century architecture has to offer. As Donald Trump so eloquently put it in an interview with Chris Matthews on MSNBC’s Hardball, “(the new WTC site) looks like a junkyard. And it shouldn’t be built.”
Not only did developers push forth with the new 1 WTC, but they even it kept it from the American people that it is not an original design.
The New York Observer’s Matt Chaban reported on Sept. 12 that a strikingly similar building, right down to the “heavenly spire” and “chamfered corners,” already exists in Tianjin, China.
With all this controversy and problem-rife construction, why aren’t we asking the most important question anyone could ask of this situation: why not rebuild the Twin Towers?
Rebuilding the Twin Towers is the most logical solution to the conundrum in which we find ourselves when it comes to what should happen at Ground Zero.
The Twin Towers were true American icons. What the Statue of Liberty stood for to the waves of immigrants in the 19th and 20th Centuries, the Twin Towers stood for to newcomers to America from all over the globe since 1973.
They stood for resilience, man’s desire to touch the sky and strive toward the future; a 1982 New York guidebook boasting the awe-inspiring towers and the observation deck even came with a disclaimer: “… in the evening, please don’t touch the stars.”
Even 10 years later, you cannot escape the symbol of the towers as you walk the streets of Manhattan—you see it on garbage trucks, murals, business advertisements, cheap wares hocked by vendors in Battery Park.
The towers weren’t just symbols of New York. They were New York. Built during one of the most strenuous economic times in the city’s history, the towers represented the unwavering hope New Yorkers had for their city. On a larger scale, the towers came to represent a similar hope Americans had for their country.
Standing 110 floors, the towers were the country’s guiding light, a symbol that we would latch onto, steering us into a brighter future. They were man-made mountains, easily seen from every borough of the city and from New Jersey, dwarfing the rest of Manhattan in their shadow of hope and prosperity.
Hollywood loved them and built up their image as American icons—to prove it, watch any NYC movie from between 1973 and 2001, the Towers are prominently featured, as though they were characters in the film themselves.
Unfortunately, as opinions are so often changed, in the days after 9/11, movie companies scrambled to cut out shots of the Twin Towers from films in their vaults, citing taste in doing so.
Not only is rebuilding the Towers the logical thing to do, it’s what the American people want. A poll conducted by MSNBC asking whether or not New York should rebuild the Towers or go ahead with the planned Freedom Tower revealed that over 90 percent of Americans wanted to see the Twin Towers in their rightful spots.
America has spent billions of dollars rebuilding other countries so why not spend the billions on ourselves? We even rebuilt the wall of the Pentagon. Other countries spend similar amounts preserving and rebuilding their cities and sites (Egypt with the Sphinx and Pyramids, Italy with Coliseum, Poland with Warsaw), why can’t we do the same thing?
Also, by rebuilding the Twin Towers, we are sending a message to terrorists worldwide, saying “when we get knocked down, we get back up.” The greatest victory in the War on Terror that we, as Americans, could ever achieve would be rebuilding the Towers.
The world is full of nay-sayers right now, with people like Chris Ward, the Executive Director of the New York and New Jersey Port Authority telling the New Zealand Herald News, “Soaring, beautiful office buildings is what New York needs… It didn’t need at this point a symbol, a message.”
A message is precisely what New York and America need right now to once again instill hope in us to move headlong into the future in these dark days where the War on Terror seems unwinnable and the recession grows and grows. We need those masts again to guide us through treacherous waters.
There is hope in seeing these giants restored. Due to increased pressure on developers, construction has slowed significantly with Tower 1 coming to a standstill, Tower 2 placed on hold indefinitely and Tower 3 sent back to the drawing board. The real hope comes in the plans of Ken Gardner and Herbert Belton (who is now deceased), the two architects responsible for the Twin Towers II.
This plan would not only see the Towers’ return, this time a floor taller as the ultimate gesture to terrorists.
These towers would be incredibly safer, with state-of-the-art fireproofing instead of spray-on proofing previously used, more stairwells and elevators in case of emergency, and both buildings would withstand plane crashes better than the Freedom Tower.
Even with the Freedom Tower about halfway completed, this plan is still a reality.
We the concerned public have the voice with which to get this achieved. Make this possibility a reality and restore the New York skyline to its former prominence before we are forced to live with that cemetery they are constructing down at Ground Zero.
Each of us lost something on 9/11, whether it was physical, mental, emotional, or spiritual, we are not the same people we were before that day. We lost our legs when we lost the Twin Towers.
If we keep on with the building of the proposed WTC site, we will have to live the rest of our days looking at those stumps and trying to make do; we will refuse to heal and relegate ourselves to the rampant victimization we have endured in the past decade.
If we rebuild the Twin Towers, however, it’s not our way of growing new legs as there is no way we could ever replace the originals. By building the new Twin Towers, we’re giving ourselves the ability to walk again, the ability to get up, and most importantly, the ability to move forward.

Conner McDonough can be reached at cmcdonough@spartans.ut.edu.

Isaiah 9:10 BOOK: The Harbinger by Jonathan Cahn
BE WARNED!!!
This is a Wonderful article and is nice, everybody wants the twin towers rebuild. With Osama bin Laden dead and gone we have to do the right thing. and a lot of americans want want them back.
This is an interesting article, and I certainly respect the author’s opinion. I do not agree with the criticisms regarding the current design. I recently toured the 911 memorial, and was completely overwhelmed with its symbolism. The entire WTC sites, once complete, will be an iconic section of the city and equally awe inspiring. It is finally time to move on.
Now that Osama bin Laden is dead and gone we must Rebuild the Twin Towers. it will show us that we won and the terrorist lose. We want the Twin Towers back and so do Americans.
Donald Trump is Right about rebuilding the twin towers and he should be in charge of the site and we don’t want to alter our skyline.
Ken Gardner’s twin towers is much better.
Well-The article is clearly one person’s opinion and I’m sure there are many who agree with him. However I don’t. While the new design is never going to satisfy everyone it does serve dual purposes.
1) It honors those who died at the site and gives family members a place to visit their departed.
2)It rebuilds the office space that was taken away by the attacks.
What the author of this article fails to understand is that it took a long time to build the original twin towers. In fact it was an idea born in the mid 50’s and did not get finished until 1970. It was not a profitable venture for many many years. Further the entire area has changed since 911. Gone are most of the trading houses and insurance companies. They have permanently relocated. Further the housing population has more then doubled since before the twin towers were destroyed. The whole area has changed. Therefore it makes no sense to build what was once there.The businesses that are there are new and different. The people who live in the area are new. Even the hotels are new. It is no longer the fianancial district that it was. It is a different place now. So rebuilding what was arguably 2 sticks of margerine makes no sense at all.The new buildings reflect a new area. The pools of water pay homage and honor to what was once there and the people who lost there lives. It is not perfect but then few things are. To have rebuilt the towers as they were would insult the people who died as their families. I would have done the memorial differently but I respect what was done. When the economy comes back the remaining 2 buildings will be built and this site will be it’s own city within a city with a lot more visually intersting buildings then the twin towers ever were.The new world trade center sight signifies a new rennasonce of lower Manhattan with 4 skyscrapers instead of 2.
Time to go with the times. I like the new design and I am a New Yorker. New century and new hope, new direction. They were great towers for their time, but now, we must accept the change and look to a new day of strength.
Last year, a house around the corner from where I live burned down. The owners didn’t ask neighborhood kids to submit creative and funky designs for what kind of house should be built in place of the one that burned; instead, he rebuilt what had been there – what had worked perfectly well for his family – and today someone driving by wouldn’t know that anything had ever happened there.
In 1941, there were no “contests” to design something daringly artistic at Pearl Harbor. They repaired and rebuilt. (Indeed, of the 18 ships sunk that morning, only two are still there…)
The section of the Pentagon which was destroyed wasn’t replaced by some funky glass-and-stainless-steel art nouveau; they rebuilt what had been there for the past 60 years. (And reopened the damaged wing on the *first* anniversary of the attacks – a major F-U to al-Qaeda!)
If someone like Trump had been allowed to take the reins right away, the 111-story Twin Towers II would have probably opened officially on September 11, 2006, with the recovered flag from the originals flying proudly from the mast. Instead, here we are 10 years along: all we have is an incomplete stump of the abomination that will be the “Freedom Tower” (which, as mentioned above, will only be a monument to the LMDC’s freedom to ignore the will of 15 million New Yorkers) and what Donald Trump so aptly calls “The al-Qaeda Victory Pit”.
“They” (ie: whoever is in charge this week) should put a roof on the Freedom Tower at whatever floor they’re on, sign Donald Trump to take charge of the project and put back the only two things that belong on that site. (Oh, and while we’re at it, they’ll have to change the name of the current WTC-1 (ie: The Freedom Tower) to WTC-3; only the North Tower can be WTC-1!)
Yes, its a good idea to rebuild the towers. But, on the other hand, if something like this was to happen again, thats just to high to reach people. Nothing should be that high up knowing that in case of emergency, how would ee be able to get people out and fast. Just a thought. But love the towers.
Just one more tidbit, Yeah the New York Skyline should be Restored!!! It can be done, we are the United States of America! We can do anything if it wasnt for political corruption and having there own way on things instead of giving the american tax payers who are paying for those monstrosities that they are building right now. They should return the New York Skyline to New Yorkers and to the American people. Rebuild Twin Towers II i couldnt agreee more.
Hello, you have hit the nail on the head with this article and i couldn’t agree more. I can’t believe the eyesore down on ground zero. After the attacks, all the american people heard was we were going to rebuild even taller and stronger and all that and it was flat out lie. We arent building taller and stronger they are building shorter and uglier than what majesty stood before. Looking at the Twin Towers before made americans feel pride and accomplishment. I am all for rebuilding the Twin Towers II and I think Donald Trump should be the one in charge of getting them back up stronger and a tad taller than they once were and back in lower manhattan where they belong. These new buildings that they have been building which feels like a century will never fill the footprints of the original World Trade Towers. Never! Heck 2 wtc isnt even going to be as tall to the rooftop as the one before. Just going to be a short shiny piece of junk. If they had just built the reflection pools and rebuilt the new Twin Towers II each in front of each original footprint then each building would have reflected into each pool where the original buildings stood before then i could have lived with that but oh no cant do that gots to build some other fancy dancy ugly buildings. I will keep my fingers crossed for the rebuilding of the Twin Towers II and hope that the 90% of people who wanted them rebuilt prevail but I won’t hold my breath. Good luck!
Couldn’t agree more with this article! Thanks for sharing and lets hope justice will come and we will have the Twin Towers II. It is the right thing to do.
This is a great article! thank you so so much for writing this! I never got a chance to see the Towers in person, and rebuilding them is the right thing to do. It would also give so many people the chance to see the full New York City Skyline with the Twin Towers. I really hope this becomes a reality soon! We must work together for the Twin Towers II!.